Ultima Ratio Regum

Scene from the movie "1984"

Big Brother is Watching You.  I end my blogs with this line.  I use it out of irony, a homage to its Orwellian roots, since I write these blogs for my government class.  The term exists today as a close bedfellow of government, championed by those that are decried as "conspicacy theorists" and lacking mental acumen.  But how crazy are they? How many of us know of Operation Northwoods and the government plot to fly a plane into a building and blame it on the Cubans in the sixties to justify military action? Sounds awfully familiar, does it not? This is fact. Or even the more recent one of added mandatory government black boxes in all new vehicles produced after 2015? Here it is in Section 31406 of Senate Bill 1813 (known as MAP-21).  




How many of us have even heard of George Soros: Billionaire foreign national; Contributes heavily to liberal and leftist, radical foundations?   Why did George Soros help fund the Secretary of State Project?  Why did he help craft the stimulus package and then invest in companies that would benefit, as proclaimed by the research in the book "Throw Them All Out" by Peter Scheweizer?  Why did he form a secret billionaire club that is intent on transforming the United States into a European style socialist state that has recently proclaimed that is will "drown Democrats and President Obama’s re-election campaign in an ocean of cash this year"?  (Wait a minute, I thought republicans were the party of the rich. hmmm.)


Here he is in an interview declaring that there needs to be a "New World Order."


Does anyone remember the President stating in a speech his need for a "civilian army"? Well, he got one in the TSA, which are not federal officers such as the ATF or FBI, but civilians which means that the same rules do not apply.  Hell, here is U.S.  House Rep. Sheila Jackson (D-TX) just recently announcing TSA agents on Houston buses. ( Lets not forget about VIPR in Tennessee.)  Really? Of course this is the same woman that planted a fake doctor in her town hall meeting.  Does anyone remember that? Does anyone else remember that Hitler had a "civilian army" as well? Does anyone remember the TSA declaring that transportation did not mean just airports? Does anyone remember the former director of the TSA accepting money from the very company that he was championing the government to buy the full body scanners from? (The hiring practices of this administration frightens me). Oh,  lets not forget the witness stating how the "Underwear Bomber" was a false flag operation, and now we have in place more restrictions and full body scanners in America airports because of this incident. 


Oh yeah, there needed to be a public incident to justify such action. Hmmm.  Does history seem to be repeating?  


Does anyone remember the governor of North Carolina,  Beverly Purdue (D) stating the need to suspend Federal elections? She was not the only one to do that.  It was parroted in other places as well.  But they said that she was "just making a joke." 

 Here is that video.  


Watch it. Tell me by the way she speaks it if you think she was making a joke.

Or when the President declares he will have more flexibility with dealing with the Russians after the elections.
what else has he been waiting to make a move on? Gun control?  I can remember the President, months prior to the outbreak of the "Fast & Furious" scandal, telling Sara Brady that they were "working behind the scenes" on gun control.  But of course, neither him nor Eric "let's brainwash people into believing guns are bad" Holder knew of this operation...  Riiiiiiiggghht. 


But hey, at least gun control advocates have their heroes, as this image so eloquently sums up.

So using logic, if Hilter took peoples guns away, and Hilter was a Nazi, then anyone whom wants gun control is a Nazi... hmmm.   


The most frightening of this all is that the Obama Administration may be trying to steal the election.  


After failing to have the talking point of "suspending federal elections" catch on and previously losing big during the midterm elections, this administration is moving forward with something that scares me to no end.  The Obama administration has contracted out the vote tallying for this coming federal election to a spanish-based company owned by George Soros and whose CEO is a communist. WHAT? How can anyone justify this action?  Why not use an american company? Why is there such an emphasis on using electronic votes and not paper ballots?  Why do communists keep popping up around this man?  Why did Team Obama strong arm and intimidate primary voters in 2008? Hell, they made a film about it that is ignored by the MSM! How can anyone continue to support this Administration?  Why, because they have a (D) next to their name? Looking at this one can begin to see why they are against "voter i.d." laws, even after it was proven  in New Hampshire and even Washington D.C. that voter fraud can and does occur.


 Its like rooting for your favorite sports team.  Regardless if they win or lose you are still stuck where you were in life.  You still have to shell out $60+ for a nosebleed ticket even after having raised your taxes to pay for a new stadium where you get charged $75 for a pizza after paying $40-100 for parking (as they do in Dallas, Tx.), but in this case the freedoms you have enjoyed are being taken away, not just your money. Is this alright since you choose to identify with these people? 


Where is the media in all of this?


Ahhh, yes the "Media". It is complicit in this as well.  My Government book told me that the media was "unbiased" that the "American news media provides generally balanced coverage..."  I scoffed at this promulgation. Generally?  What is that, 40-60 percent?  It does not mean 100%, that's for sure.  Having been alive and paying attention for the past 30+ years, my personal experience tells me otherwise.  There may be an unbiased approach when some local news stations are doing a piece, but any reporting that remotely has to do with a MSM outlet, biased intent tends to be a foregone conclusion  . Perhaps they never knew or just chose to ignore the study waaaaay back in 2005 (five years prior to the printing of the book) by a UCLA political scientist that shows how far spread the bias is when stating "Despite studies to the contrary..." What studies and by whom?  They don't say.  I found that UCLA study within 15 seconds on a Google search. Guess they weren't trying to find other viewpoints that did not fit the narrative.  At least the authors were factual in stating the bias in the Presidential campaign, as backed up by ABC News in this article about the 2008 presidential campaign which found the media was biased in its coverage. Here are the charts that is gives, which when one actually reads the website it references the website itself states that the media is biased in its reporting.  But how do you go from the beginning of the section saying the media is not biased but then end it with showing how biased it actually is?  How do you say it was for commercial value and not political as well, such as when Time Magazine printed the Presidents face numerous times on its cover prior to the election? A look at this website shows how many times, including the dates, plus the numerous other publications he appeared on as well, and this did not have a political connection?  


 It saddens me to know of the many young impressionable minds that read this, and ultimately accept it, without actually asking whether it is true of not, and later regurgitate it to others.


 After witnessing the doctoring of evidence by CNN, NBC, and ABC and the introduction of the term white-hispanic to the modern day lexicon, how can any rational person still believe that tripe?  Why was Drudgereport blasted for showing the true pictures of Trayvon Martin?  How about the CBS fiasco with Dan Rather?  Why does my book make no mention of the "Journolist Scandal" which shows how widespread the bias is rampant in the Media? Here's an article in USAToday that sheds more light on the bias in the media .  The media can be biased by not including the relevant facts, or even reporting on the events at all.  I'm sure I will hear all about Ann Romney's character flaws, and nothing about Michelle Obama being disbarred for extortion, and quite honestly I would rather not hear about either one.  But hey, when George Soros's money can be found in 30 plus different American Media outlets, is one really shocked by this at all? 


Hell, I know that there was a letter Newt Gingrich wrote in the 70's applying to be the President of the University where he taught but I do not have one example of scholastic work from the Ivy-Leagued educated Sitting President. Why?  




One of my favorite meme's.

Why is the question.  Why is he romanticized into being something he was not? It just shows how far along we have walked this path that less than savory characters become idolized heroes. Why is there this upholding of these "revolutionaries" that were nothing more than murderous thieves whom wanted everything to themselves? He told his men to fight to the death, yet when the Bolivians surrounded him in that cave he said not to shoot, he was Che', he was valuable.  Ah yes, what a profound and great leader he was.

I'm reminded of an episode of  "Sealab 2021" in which the Captain Murphy launches a communist revolution, and towards the end of this episode I heard one of the truest quotes I will ever hear, ironic as it may be from a cartoon.

 Quinn: “I think the great struggle is all made up…the only thing we’re struggling against is him.”
Debbie: “So wait, you’re saying communism is bad?”
Quinn: “What are you, two years old? Hasn’t history proven that Marx’s vision of an egalitarian utopia is unattainable, inevitably creating an oligarchy more oppressive to the proletariat than the bourgeoisie it vilifies?”




Are there are legitimate forces that conspire to have  a "revolution" in America? Perhaps one created from the depths of poverty much like the one the National Socialists did in Germany? After all, people on Government assistance is way up in the past three years.  When one looks at the whole and not the pieces, it sure seems that way. From the influence of anti-american foreign nationals, to the rigging of this years elections, to the fabrication of events, it scares me when people are still supportive of these individuals, for that states that they either do not know any better or just do not care. The ends DO NOT justify the means. Perhaps if children still read Aesop's fables such as "The Farmer and the Viper," the inherent evil would be readily recognized. 


Is Conquer and Divide part of their battle plan? You see it all the time with the diabolical Hyphen. Nothing is more evil for it it used to separate Americans into subgroups, to get us to fight each other endlessly. Those who proclaim equality for all and the end to racism are the first to judge you by your race, and the first to state what race they are.  


Louie XIV cast upon his cannons "The Last Argument of Kings."  When all else has failed, the talking, the diplomacy, all there is left is to inflict your will by the means of force. 


How far are we from this final solution? How much longer until the faux realities created by partisan words begin to crumble and the emperor is shown to have no clothes? What happens when they can no longer conceal the fraud?  Will they let go of power so easily?  


History has shown otherwise. An insightful read, Twelve Days: The Story of the Hungarian Revolution shows the realities of "utopian" society when it begins to break down; the lessons within this book still ring true til this day. 


It is just like George Orwell is quoted as saying, which now seems to be  hauntingly true 

"During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act"

Remember: Big Brother is Watching You